Re: ITP: mencal -- A menstruation calendar
> I understand that there is a fine difference b/w something that is
> useless and might be useful but lets be resonable here. Is it fine to
> package something like an application that will play a sound file
> at the top of the hour?? I would find that very much useless as there
> are many ways of doing that without adding more packages to the archive.
> Someone before said that for a package to be included in Debian, x
> number of DD should vote for it so it's accepted. With this ITP, I think
> that the voting become much more popular to me.
> Anyway, this should _not_ be a seperate package - maybe they should add it
> as another built-in app into Emacs :)
Or in the real world it might be a patch to gcal, so gcal can be
extended as a 'really nifty' calendar package.
Peter 'darke' Crystal
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org