Re: Why does autoconf depend on autoconf2.13?

[Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu>]

Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:

> Oh, I'm not really complaining.  (It's kind of odd with the dependancy
> and the diversions, but the reasoning is sound.)  I wasn't even aware of
> autoconf-wrapper (that's a Debianism, right?), until I noticed that it
> seemed to be the only thing present in 2.13 and not present in 2.5x.

Yes, it's a Debianism.
-- 
"Because computer source code is an expressive means for the exchange
 of information and ideas about computer programming, we hold that it
 is protected by the First Amendment."
--Hon. Boyce F. Martin, Jr., for the 6th Circuit Court, Junger vs. Daley