[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libusb...

"Adam Majer" <adamm@galacticasoftware.com> cum veritate scripsit:

> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 02:39:23PM -0500, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> > Perhaps I missed something along the way, but why has the libusb
> > package moved from the nominally-standard libusb0 naming to this
> > libusb-0.1-4 name?  This would seem to be in violation of policy
> > section 11.3.

> Probably because upstream doesn't follow proper versioning.
> I maintain stuff that is not binary compatible b/w minor 
> releases like 1.4 -> 1.5.

That's probably a real problem.

libusb is:


I don't know what the guy tries to mean here, but it is probably
a library under the name of "libusb-0.1"
With a soversion of 4


dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4

Reply to: