[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libusb...



On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 02:39:23PM -0500, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Perhaps I missed something along the way, but why has the libusb
> package moved from the nominally-standard libusb0 naming to this
> libusb-0.1-4 name?  This would seem to be in violation of policy
> section 11.3.
> 
> Mike.

Probably because upstream doesn't follow proper versioning.
I maintain stuff that is not binary compatible b/w minor 
releases like 1.4 -> 1.5.

- Adam



Reply to: