Re: libusb...
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 02:39:23PM -0500, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Perhaps I missed something along the way, but why has the libusb
> package moved from the nominally-standard libusb0 naming to this
> libusb-0.1-4 name? This would seem to be in violation of policy
> section 11.3.
>
> Mike.
Probably because upstream doesn't follow proper versioning.
I maintain stuff that is not binary compatible b/w minor
releases like 1.4 -> 1.5.
- Adam
Reply to:
- References:
- libusb...
- From: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@debian.org>