On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 09:58:31AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 12:53:28PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote: > > > I'm not sure I like the way the new installer works -- it seems as though > > > when I upload a package, it is immediately "accepted", and the bugs are > > > closed, but then the package still takes the normal 1-2 days to make it into > > > the main archive. It seems to me that we shouldn't be closing open bugs > > > until the package is actually available. > > > > So you want bugs to be closed only when the package is available on all > > architectures? > > That would seem to be the correct way to do it -- is that a problem for a lot > of people? Most of my packages are architecture-independent, so I guess I'm > biased. I think the correct way is as it done now. Else you can also argue that the package should first be in the testing and stable pools. Else you might have a chance that the user still runs the buggy package and files a bugreport. That doesn't make sense to me. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: jeroen@openprojects
Attachment:
pgpHsIeu28RX3.pgp
Description: PGP signature