On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 09:51:04AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 11:25:06AM +0100, Peter Mathiasson wrote: > > I've always seen that as a plus. Great for servers, no? > > Not really. potato is lacking large file support, journalling > filesystems, a decent out-of-box raid, etc. Hell, a lot of new hardware > isn't even capabable of installing potato. You have a good point there. Still, I think long release cycles are a pretty good idea. Though I would have loved to see woody out by now. Two years might be too long, but I don't see 1+ year as a problem, And I for sure don't want any release every 4 month. -- Peter Mathiasson | GPG Fingerprint: E-Mail: peter(at)mathiasson(dot)nu | A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 Web : http://www.mathiasson.nu | 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
Attachment:
pgpIKgAdnJD3z.pgp
Description: PGP signature