On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 09:25:39AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 08:15:54PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote: > > Here is yet another example of a Debian subscriber filing spam > > complaints against Brainfood for spam on Debian lists. We need to arrive > > at a solution. This is causing serious issues for us. > First, I do support implementation of a scheme like moderation for > unknown posters, or tmda. Something needs to be done. > However, I'm wondering: what happens to people who erroneously report > the source of spam, as you have demonstrated here? Such > "ready-fire-aim" behavior may make the spam recipient feel better, but > no real damage is done to the spammer, and real damage is done to > debian. Therefore, I feel people who aren't responsible enough to > investigate the true source of spam before reporting the debian lists > as the source should be removed from the debian lists. A good idea in principal -- but if we take that approach, will we succeed in ridding the lists of idiots before Brainfood is forced to pull the plug? Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpxMofaO0C27.pgp
Description: PGP signature