Re: curly brackets a bashism?
Glenn Maynard <email@example.com> writes:
> 7.2 describes Depends, and that's the obvious place to look for the answer to
> the general question "should essential packages be dependencies?", of which
> this is one particular example. (I'd hope the answer is yes or no, and not
> "yes, with the exception of packages providing shells for scripts".)
See Section 2.3.4. Dependencies:
Packages are not required to declare any dependencies they have on
other packages which are marked `Essential' (see below), and should
not do so unless they depend on a particular version of that package.
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <firstname.lastname@example.org>
|_) (_) |_) 1294 S.W. Seagull Way <email@example.com>
Palm City, FL USA GPG Key ID: 390D6559
PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9