Re: It's Huntin' Season
>>"Jules" == Jules Bean <email@example.com> writes:
Jules> On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:18:35PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>> Emacs policy dictates that elisp files that are eval'ed at Emacs startup
>> go under /etc/emacs. However, these aren't necessarily configuration
>> files (even if policy dictates that they be conffiles). So that's a
>> problem with Emacs policy. (e.g. lots of other programs load some init
>> code at startup that isn't stored under /etc nor tagged as conffiles.)
Jules> IMO, that should be /usr/share/emacs somewhere. (It is perfectly
Jules> acceptable to symlink it to /etc if that seems appropriate).
For what it is worth, I disagree strongly. Start up files
change the behaviour of my editor-OS, and I should have a chance to
tweak that. Every rationale that lead us to declare that all
configuration files need bve under /etc, and that these need to be
editable applies to emacs lisp start files as well.
>> It doesn't usually hurt much of anything by tagging them as such except
>> that half (or so) of us hadn't done so. Also, Tagging them as conffiles
>> has the drawback that it leaves crud on the system when you remove
>> instead of purge the package.
Jules> If that is considered a drawback, then they definitely shouldn't be in
Jules> /etc. /etc is for configuration which the user would want preserved
Jules> after remove, by (Debian-Policy) definition.
And how exactly do emacs lisp start up files not qualify?
You humans have that emotional need to express gratitude. "You're
welcome," I believe, is the correct response. Spock, "Bread and
Circuses", stardate 4041.2
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C