Re: Protecting user changes in developer scripts handled files
>>"Gustavo" == Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org> writes:
Gustavo> I don't think dpkg should be changed this way by now
Gustavo> also... what about debconf? As it is going to be used mostly
Gustavo> on debconfized packages that does make sense
Umm, who says it is going to be used mostly on debconfized
packages? I ma planning on using it on 3 of my packages, and they
have not yet been debconfized. Indeed, the script was motivated by
emacs lisp packages, not debconf ones, though it would work equally
well for those.
manoj
--
When I left the meeting, I had the definite impression that I had
found the same game as with the seals: management reducing criteria
and accepting more and more errors that weren't designed into the
device, while the engineers are screaming from below, "HELP!" and
"This is a RED ALERT!" Richard P. Feynman, about NASA, _What Do You
Care What Other People Think?_
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: