Re: Proposal: Why not use testing-proposed-updates?
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > I really fear library problems and out-of-sync packages with this
> > attempt.
> I don't see that library issues are any worse than uploads to stable.
> I'm not quite sure what you mean by out-of-sync packages though. You
> mean out of sync with updates from unstable?
No. I'm talking about such cases:
xcin stable 2.3.04-1 arm
xcin stable 126.96.36.199-1 powerpc
xcin stable 188.8.131.52.pre6.1-1 alpha
xcin stable 2.5.2-1 i386, m68k, sparc
xcin testing 184.108.40.206.pre2+cvs20020101-2 alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
xcin unstable 220.127.116.11.pre2+cvs20020101-2 alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
xcin updates 2.5.2-1 alpha, powerpc
See how the stable version is in sync through all stable architectures?
All language designers are arrogant. Goes with the territory...
-- Larry Wall
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.