[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFC] GNU autoconf and dpkg-architecture



On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 12:09:15PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:

> 0. dpkg-buildpackage has already run dpkg-architecture and set those
>    variables for you anyway, one might as well use them for something like
>    Debian policy urges one to.
> 1. The build and host architecture are correctly set to the ones Debian
>    should be using (e.g. i386-pc-linux-gnu for all ia32 machines). And
>    anyone who wants to set it to something else just needs to set the proper
>    environment variable.
> 2. config.guess is never called (a damn Good Thing)
>    Less wasted CPU cycles, and one less point of failure are a Good Thing!
>    One needs only to look at how the newer 2.4 kernels broke config.guess
>    on MIPS to understand why (btw, have you updated your config.* crap this
>    year? if not, you have the broken MIPS code in your package).
> 3. It looks like the Right Way to do things re. the
>    almost-never-used-for-anything build and host stuff in GNU config,
>    and the spirit of section 5.2 and 12.1 of Debian policy.

4. It's necessary for cross-building any package that uses autoconf.  
   While there are many issues with cross-building, there's no reason 
   that cross-builds of Debian packages should be more difficult than 
   cross-builds of upstream sources.

> The question is:

> Should I try to get the above way of calling configure to be the "do it
> unless you know damn well you need to do it differently" way of doing things
> in all Debian packages that use GNU autoconf?  

I believe so, but of course I think you know that already based on the 
bug I filed against dh-make. :)

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgpjhXAztmXKp.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: