[Retraction] Re: how did cupsomatic-ppd get into testing?
I just realized this version of the package actually isn't in
testing... apparently adding unstable to my sources.list and putting
APT::Default-Release "testing"; in my apt.conf will still allow packages from unstable to be installed if they're necessary to upgrade an already installed package... bummer.
Anyway, I retract what I said in the parent post.
DvB <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> The above package is in testing, even though it has one "grave" and one
> "important" functionality bug.
> First, printing stopped working due to the "grave" bug. This appeared
> shortly after a kernel upgrade debacle in which I neglected to compile
> the lp module into my new kernel, so I assumed the problem was caused by
> my own stupidity and it didn't occur to me that it might be a bug in the
> Now, the package won't even finish installing due to the "important"
> bug (conflicts with one of its dependencies), which finally prompted me
> to visit its bug page and realize what my problem was all along.
> Shouldn't versions of packages with this level of bugginess be kept out
> of testing?
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org