Re: Vanishing /usr/doc symlink
If it's possible to install woody against potato without errors caused
by a missing /usr/doc then the tech committee's migration plan is no
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:51:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 08:43:02PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > I think a fresh woody without /usr/doc is compatible with the goal of
> > > the transition plan, however if you read the transition plan you will
> > > see it's based on some assumptions which are no longer true (for
> > > example, that dpkg does not have some features it has now). Before
> > > saying that such and such is against the decision of the technical
> > > committee, should not the technical committee issue a revised plan?
> > I wouldn't mind hearing their thoughts. I am not interested much in
> > running for them for a decision since they have historically been slow
> > to react.
> Santiago is trying to trick us with this reference to the Technical
> Commitee, which is dead in all but name. They couldn't even muster
> the energy to unanimously vote against me in the last issue brought
> before them by Brian Mays and myself.
> G. Branden Robinson | If a man ate a pound of pasta and a
> Debian GNU/Linux | pound of antipasto, would they
> email@example.com | cancel out, leaving him still
> http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | hungry? -- Scott Adams