Re: A suggestion for the woody freeze
Adrian Bunk <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> It would IMHO become much easier if we would freeze packages _before_ we
> work on getting them into a releasable state - I'm currently more and more
> becoming a fan of the "freeze all packages at the same time" approach
> because then all of these problems are no longer present.
Yes, I'm also in favour of the "good old" freeze.
I think that we did not really think about how testing would work
at the freeze time.
I know I'll get flammed but we could decide to use testing for woody+1,
i.e. when everything is thought and planned, and get back to the old
release still right now.
Jérôme Marant <email@example.com>