Re: A suggestion for the woody freeze

[Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>]

Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> cum veritate scripsit:

> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 04:52:09PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > 	I think this is a flaw, then. ALl packages that a frozen
> >  package depends on also need to be frozen.
> 
> Along these lines, shouldn't all packages that base packages depend on
> also be in base?

We don't count the build-depends.

And we have a lot of loops if we count the build-dependency as 
a dependency that the term "base" would include so many packages.

I think I wrote a script trying to detect that a while back...

regards,
	junichi

-- 
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4