Re: A suggestion for the woody freeze
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> But in the discussions I had with our release manager before I wrote the
> initial mail in this thread he explixcitely stated that boot-floppies need
> to be in a releasable state before the next stage of the freeze begins
> (note that not only the base packages but also the the standard packages
> including all packages in tasks must be in a releasable state before we
> can enter the next stage of the freeze).
Which means they're freezing with standard+tasks, not base. This is
because the boot floppies can easily be broken if base changes, so this
gave them a chance to get settled down in relation to a non-moving
target.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: