Hi .. On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:27:58AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote: >Because of those events, I will not do NMUs, not to anyones packages, not >at any time. I think other developers have similar beliefs for similar >reasons. I don't need any more enemies, so why bother with the "dangerous" >task of NMUing. I must publically compliment the people whom do NMUs as >they > >What I think we need, is a policy change that dramatically loosens the >rules about NMUs, to encourage more of them. We had already the disussion about a second Maintainer for each package or the most of the packages in debian. I think, this is a good I Idea to prevent the most oft NMU's. Best Regards Jan -- One time, you all will be emulated by linux! ---- Jan- Hendrik Palic Url:"http://www.billgotchy.de"; E-Mail: "palic@billgotchy.de" -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a-- C++ UL++ P+++ L+++ E W++ N+ o+ K- w--- O- M- V- PS++ PE Y+ PGP++ t--- 5- X+++ R-- tv- b++ DI-- D+++ G+++ e+++ h+ r++ z+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
pgpkQwfjVb2W7.pgp
Description: PGP signature