Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.
Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:36:01PM +0100, tpo2@sourcepole.ch wrote:
> >
> > > IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AFAIK the only well and out of the box
> > > interoperating combination of MUA and IMAPd is pine together with
> > > uw-imapd which is about as configurable as your sunglasses. With other
> > > Linux combinations you'll have to go fiddling with Prefix&|View =
> > > INBOX. | INBOX* | INBOX.% | INBOX etc.
> >
> > Most things (certainly mutt and kmail, I can't think of anything else I
> > tried that gave me problems) interoperate quite happily with both UW
> > IMAP and Courier IMAP. I can't think off-hand of a client that wouldn't
> > play with UW IMAP.
>
> I have yet to find out how to be able to see my inbox as well as all its
> subfolders (that's how it's set up on cyrus) from home.
I am not sure if uw-imap supports anything else but mbox format by
default and with mbox you cannot have folders that contain message and
subfolders (it's one or another). so there's no such thing as inbox and
its subfolders.
if you're using maildir and it doesn't work properly then I don't
know, haven't tried uw-imap with maildir...
erik
Reply to: