[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Appropriate? mutt/mailx requires mail-transport-agent

On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:22:44PM +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
> >I'm working on a diskless workstation configuration where I don't want
> >mailers running on each machine, though users may have access to the
> >mail spool through nfs.  Is it appropriate for apt-get to coerce exim
> >to be installed when I only need a reader?  Is this a problem about
> >finding the smtp agent?
> What do mailx and mutt do if you try to send mail and no MTA is installed?
> Unless they handle this situation gracefully, which doesn't seem all that
> likely, this dependency is correct.

My objection is simply that while there is a need for an available
SMTP server, there is no need for it to be local.  I'm going to look
into some alternatives and post a recommendation.

Reply to: