also sprach Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk> [2002.01.07.1859 +0100]:
> That would be completely inconsistent with all other Postfix
> installations out there and rather non-obvious when you try and look it
> up in the common case where only Postfix is installed.
[also answering dominik's post]
okay, but how then would you do it? a new section like 8postfix or so
would be almost too progressive, and i am not sure if mandb can just
handle that...
> > i'll file a bug... and should this bug go against postfix only, or also
> > postfix-tls? as i understand, postfix-tls is sort of an offspring of
> > postfix and thus should be fixed automagically the next time the
> > maintainer apt-gets source postfix, applies the patch, and
> > dpkg-buildpackages...
>
> Well, I guess a bug against postfix-tls might prompt a more rapid
> update.
it's been fixed, according to lamont, in the unstable package. maybe
he'll post how he did it, if not, i will as soon as i got an answer from
him.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
"no, 'eureka' is greek for 'this bath is too hot.'"
-- dr. who
Attachment:
pgpi580TdKmzQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature