Re: 2 package(s) to rebuild on i386/stable
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> firstname.lastname@example.org (Martin Schulze) writes:
> > These packages have to be rebuilt for stable on i386 in order to let
> > the packages go into 2.2r5.
> > ...
> > This mail was generated automatically.
> Why is the mail not simply sent to the maintainers?
Because they don't have to have a stable system anymore, hence would be
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.