Re: Re: RFC: Keywords instead of Section
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 17 November 2001 00:04, Daniel_Burrows@brown.edu wrote:
> > Currently, I've tried to determine which programming language to use for
> > this task. Perhaps I should direct it here.
> >
> > Which programming language would you think is most suitable for realizing
> > a particular logic language?
>
> Although it's a painful thought, you might want to
> consider that all our package management frontends
> (the programs that would need to use this) are currently
> written in C and C++. [0] I am not aware of Haskell -> C
> bindings :-/
>
> Daniel
>
> [0] unless I ever write that Scheme-based frontend
> I've been muttering about for a while now.
Well, Haskell can already interface with C quite easily. It wouldn't be
problematic to provide a generic front end to the language processor. You
only need to pass I/O between two languages and that wouldn't be too
complicated (read no graph or tree) if I'm thinking the right thing now. :)
Thanks,
- --
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE79a0ffAeuFodNU5wRAim/AJ9xAbeqgjOyBqfhOG6ZqV7zxZsQ4wCeM1Fx
UMKRqooqkGFsRICifD1u1FQ=
=5HTS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: