Re: [Debian account] I request your attention
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 August 2001 07:32 pm, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> You can always discuss the quality of the AMs and
> whether an applicant should really become a developer but it's a minimum
> amount of fairness I expect for someone who has already dedicated parts of
> his spare time for Debian that he gets told that he was rejected and why
> he was rejected instead of silently ignoring him.
IMHO, I have demonstrated my skills and my commitment to free software to a
more than sufficient degree. I have summarized my contributions in the
original post. It does not seem that I have failed any of the steps prior to
Step 5-B: Check-in. It has not yet been stated whether I have passed Step
5-A: Evaluation, but I have been recommended by my AM many many months ago.
That is, I passed all the difficult steps of the application.
I am writing this because you have written as if it would be by default fair
that I am rejected.
- From the descriptions given in new maintainer's corner, the DAM does not seem
to have the right to say: "Well, I don't like this person although there
isn't anything particularly missing or wrong in his application. I am not
creating an account for him". Since my application is otherwise complete, I
don't think there is any valid reason for rejecting my application.
If you have indeed examined my contributions and the status of my application
and have decided that I should be rejected, I would like to hear the
objective reason from you.
As I have said before, the evaluation is made by the NM-Comittee. The DAM is
responsible for checking the completeness of the information, and creating
the account when there is sufficient information.
Regards,
- --
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7dv6EfAeuFodNU5wRAiHhAJ0VcFtOGS6SOL6YKi39LUsE52zsGwCfXITF
LC/KnvWreqj0EbBTW4O8EDE=
=v6zQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: