Re: [Debian account] I request your attention
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:48:40PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:43:57PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
>> > John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> writes:
>> > > > I am much more in favour of the other two options:
>> > > > * do the reverse and reject if not approved in a certain timeframe
>> > > That makes zero sense. We should *officially* reject qualified
>> > > developers because of lack of time, personal vendetta, or whatnot?
>> > No it would make perfectly sense. If people within a month can't
>> > produce a working debian package we shouldn't waste preciouse beucracy
>> > on them.
>> As far as I kept track of it, we are talking about the last stage of the
>> application, the DAM approval. At this time, the applicant already has
>> given proof of his capabilities.
>
>The applicant's given evidence that an AM thinks is acceptable for
>inclusion into Debian. The quality of AM's varies, I'm not sure by
>how much. Some are incredibly good; at least in the past some haven't
>been. The DAM's there to judge whether the AM's right, and the applicant's
>evidence suffices for proof, or not. AIUI, you don't even have to be a
>developer yourself to be an AM.
Okay, provide empiric evidence. Name the non-DD AM.
>Cheers,
>aj
>
>
--
There is no problem so great that it cannot be solved with suitable
application of High Explosives.
Who is John Galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who!
Reply to: