Re: Time to fight for our beloved DEB format!
pfaffben@msu.edu (Ben Pfaff) wrote on 30.06.01 in <87ofr58i28.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu>:
> Way, way back in the mists of Debian history, when Bruce Perens
> was project leader, we used to have fights over rpm vs. deb all
> the time. What actual new arguments are there here? I suppose
> "LSB says RPM is standard" is one, are there others?
"ed is the standard text editor."
What does that mean?
It means that there must be a functional ed, if a script wants to use it.
It does *not* mean that *users* have to actually use it.
LSB and RPM is a similar situation.
MfG Kai
Reply to: