Re: LSB bastards
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Indeed, but I don't believe the lsb allows any dependancies in lsb
> packages except the dep on "lsb", and (perhaps, standard unclear), on
> other lsb-* packages.
See my message to M2..
> Doubt these things are allowed of LSB packages. You seem to be confusing
> LSB packages with full-featured packages..
The spec basically says everything in Maximum RPM plus the provisions
listed. So, yes, they are full-featured packages that can't use triggers,
must have specific names, and can't rely on some minor other things.
That's the problem :<
> Anyway, even if it turns out it does, I suspect I can make alien hack
> around it if I really have to. Just always put the version number in the
> package name...
Dependencies won't work then.
Jason
Reply to: