Re: /etc getting big
Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net> writes:
> On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 01:09:20PM +0300, Jukka Neppius wrote:
> >
> > I understand old Unix idea was that '/' has files needed to bring
> > system up to single user state, mount /usr and restore backups.
> >
> > So for example /etc/X11 would not belong to /etc. Most modules would
> > go into /usr/lib not into /lib. I think it is good to have all
> > configuration files in one place. Perhaps /usr/config ?
>
> no.
>
> please read the FHS, http://www.pathname.com/fhs
After quick read it seems to me that moving /etc/X11 to /var/config/
and linking it to /etc would not would not be against FHS.
'/' should only have files needed to bring system up to single user
state, mount /usr and restore backups.
- Jukka
Reply to: