Re: Bug#88588: libpam-modules: pam-limits.so is broken
On 06-Mar-01, 15:29 (CST), John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Steve Greenland wrote:
> >On 05-Mar-01, 20:32 (CST), John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> Where is a way to add to a bug that doesn't get filed?
> >>
> >
> >Nobody said anything about not filing bugs. Ben simply requested that
> >people check for an existing report instead of filing a duplicate. That
> >seems to me to be entirely reasonable.
>
> >I< did. Look at the hypothetical above it...
(Point goes *zoom* over Galt's head).
To be explicit: my point was that your hypothetical was a completely
made up scenario that had nothing to do with the current situation, and
using it as a base for argument was silly.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland <stevegr@debian.org>
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read
every list I post to.)
Reply to: