[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Perl essential ?



Ben,

Holy [expletive deleted] [expletive deleted]!!! Maybe it'd be wise to
email some perl developers about this. I think there's some other
utilities that compile perl code, by the way (perl2c or something like
that).

Regards,

Alex.

---
PGP/GPG Fingerprint:
  EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367  AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/CM>CC/IT d- s:+ a16 C++(++++)>$ UL++++>$ P--- L++>++$ E+ W+(-) N+ o? K? w---() 
!O !M !V PS+(++)>+ PE-(--) Y+>+ PGP t+>++ !5 X-- R>++ tv(+) b+(++) DI(+) D++ 
G>+++ e--> h! !r y>+++ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Ben Collins wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 08:06:59PM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> > Glenn, et al,
> > 
> > There's perlcc, also. I advise checking it out. Be sure to `ldd' it; if it
> > links against some perl .so or another, there may be a problem, but at
> > least you don't have to include the interpreter in Essential in this case.
> 
> [bmc@blimpo(11:01pm)-~]%cat hello.pl
> print "Hello World!\n";
> [bmc@blimpo(11:01pm)-~]%perlcc hello.pl
> (....)
> [bmc@blimpo(11:01pm)-~]%l hello
> -rwxr-xr-x    1 bmc      bmc        444528 Mar  1 23:01 hello*
> 
> 
> Note, that is stripped and *dynamically* linked to libperl (which means
> it would be a lat larger if it was static linked). That's unsuitable for
> replacing one large chunk of essential :)
> 
> -- 
>  -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
> /  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
> `  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bcollins@linux.com  '
>  `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
> 



Reply to: