Re: Packages and signatures
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Packages and signatures
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Date: 01 Feb 2001 01:16:21 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87k87ayit6.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
- In-reply-to: <20010131201212.B765@debian.org> (Nicolás Lichtmaier's message of "Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:12:12 -0300")
- References: <20010127024151.K19317@alcor.net> <20010127151936.A22490@taral.dhs.org> <20010127171349.M19317@alcor.net> <20010127231152.A830@debian.org> <20010127224509.Q19317@alcor.net> <20010128030306.A3706@debian.org> <20010128155213.X19317@alcor.net> <20010130230915.A8289@debian.org> <84g0i0l8ig.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au> <20010131201212.B765@debian.org>
>>"Nicolás" == Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@debian.org> writes:
Nicolás> Yes, it's very reasonable (but all signatures should be
Nicolás> from autobuilders, and no developer should be allowed to
Nicolás> upload binaries, but that's another flamewar I won't start
Nicolás> now =) ).
You really think a signature by an automated process has any
security significance whatsoever?
manoj
--
Good intentions always randomize behavior. -- Marion J. Levy, Jr.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: