On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:56:38PM -0700, John Galt wrote: > FYI 28 (aka RFC 1855) is the standard. > > There is nothing about honoring X headers at all. I didn't say there was. Does "Mail-Copies-To:" begin with an X? > In fact, the only thing the RFC says to do is to honor Reply-To: headers, > which I might note you didn't include in your message. Why should I, when it would be no different from my From: header? > Basically, you're on the wrong side of RFC 1855 on this issue and all the > bitching in the world isn't going to change it. If I'm wrong, prove it: > I've provided my proof in the form of RFC 1855. Yes, you obviously attached quite a bit of RFC reading material to your message. Now, let's examine the headers of YOUR message... From: John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Well, that's clever. Are you messages so important that you (or your MUA) feels they should be read twice? (Fortunately, I think either an RFC or the mailing list software squelches the duplicate.) Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0101031636290.13310-100000@inconnu.isu.edu> ^^^^ Oh well, at least the clue ratio of your MUA is homologous to your own, thus preserving notions of symmetry in the universe. -- G. Branden Robinson | The only way to get rid of a temptation Debian GNU/Linux | is to yield to it. branden@debian.org | -- Oscar Wilde http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpxEohqNirlv.pgp
Description: PGP signature