[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#126750/749: klogd/sysklogd should optionally be started from init(8)

On Dec 29, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> wrote:

 >> What do people think?
 >Go for it. The OOM killer will hit just about anything which is not a kernel
 >thread, and losing syslogd and klogd is a major no-no.
The OOM code is supposed to be fixed in 2.4 kernels.

I still see no reason to consider klogd more important than e.g. sshd.


Reply to: