Re: Bug#126750/749: klogd/sysklogd should optionally be started from init(8)
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Martin Schulze wrote:
> What do people think?
Go for it. The OOM killer will hit just about anything which is not a kernel
thread, and losing syslogd and klogd is a major no-no.
I do thing one should warn about the change on upgrades through a debconf
high-priority note, though. If one could select which behaviour should be
used, it would be even better.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: