Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness

To: Gerhard Tonn <GerhardTonn@swol.de>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 21:24:57 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20011228022457.GA3695@kitenet.net>
Mail-followup-to: Gerhard Tonn <GerhardTonn@swol.de>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 01122720085101.00793@tau>
References: <[🔎] 01122720085101.00793@tau>

Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> The build logs can be found at http://buildd.debian.org/ .
> xgalaga

Oddly enough I can't find any build logs for xgalaga on
buildd.debian.org, although it has built for many arches. Where's the
build log?

I also notice someone (you?) did a binary NMU of it for s390. Fixing
this problem?

-- 
see shy jo

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>

References:
- at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
  - From: Gerhard Tonn <GerhardTonn@swol.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Build systems (was Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.))
Next by Date: Re: Build systems (was Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.))
Previous by thread: Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
Next by thread: Re: at least 260 packages broken on arm, powerpc and s390 due to wrong assumption on char signedness
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread