Re: Question regarding black-box and testing
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:52:03AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 12:53:54PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Could anyone explain why update_excuses [1] doesn't mention black-box?
> > According to packages.debian.org [2] it's in unstable but not in testing,
>
> packages.debian.org is not authoritative, and often not particularly
> accurate.
>
> black-box | 1.4.5-1 | testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
It's unfair to say it's often not particularly accurate! It currently just
happens not to have black-box in the Packages file that it acquired from
mirrors.kernel.org -- it's not packages.d.o's fault that the http.us.d.o
mirror that's closest to it is having issues.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Reply to: