Re: Question regarding black-box and testing
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 12:53:54PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Could anyone explain why update_excuses [1] doesn't mention black-box?
> According to packages.debian.org [2] it's in unstable but not in testing,
packages.debian.org is not authoritative, and often not particularly
accurate.
blackbox | 0.61.1-1.1 | testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
blackbox | 0.61.1-1.1 | unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sh, sparc
black-box | 1.4.5-1 | testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
black-box | 1.4.5-1 | unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
Both blackbox and black-box are up to date in testing.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
The daffodils are coming. Are you?
linux.conf.au, February 2002, Brisbane, Australia
--- http://www.linux.org.au/conf
Reply to: