On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 10:30:58PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Right to modify is not granted, which is against DFSG #3. Must it explicitly be given? I ask this not in an attempt to argue with you, but simply to try to better understand these kinds of license (spelled correctly this time ;) issues. Redistribution is permitted and modification is not prohibited. In fact, the version I debianized is actually a modification of that version from which this license (spelled correctly this time ;) originates. If it must be explicitly given, then my only options are to put it in non-free or to contact both copyright holders and get them to agree to change the license, correct? > IMHO yes, it must go into non-free since this is against DFSG #6. How would this be against #6? Simply because one can not make money from the actual sale of this specific software does not discriminate against those who sell software... does it? -- Steaphan Greene <sgreene@cs.binghamton.edu> GPG public key: http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~sgreene/gpg.key.txt
Attachment:
pgprfw_582ToD.pgp
Description: PGP signature