Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 01:03:43PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > It seems to fair to ask the FSF which principle they value more highly
> > in this case.
>
> There is no conflict, so there is no need to weight principles against each
> other.
Some people think there is.
I continue to think the right thing to do is ask the FSF. Just as it's
polite for third parties to ask Debian before using our name.
--
G. Branden Robinson | I have a truly elegant proof of the
Debian GNU/Linux | above, but it is too long to fit
branden@debian.org | into this .signature file.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpKUwmbYl_CE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?
- From: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>
- Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: Ean Schuessler <ean@brainfood.com>
- Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: Shaya Potter <spotter@cs.columbia.edu>
- Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>