On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 04:01:00PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:43:20AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > It does matter. If "permission" has to be asked by each person who uses > > the source, then it is not DFSG compatible (nor is it compatible with > > even the GPL). > I thought we accepted a clause that means "you have to rename the program if > you change it" as DFSG free, but now I am not so sure anymore. If we don't, > then undoubtly it matters. We would stay on the very safe side if we would > rename it, because then everyone gets the renamed version and is safe, too. If we don't we have to worry about things under the Artistic license as well, don't we? -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Attachment:
pgpdyYdrtKyz6.pgp
Description: PGP signature