[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

apache non-free?

> BTW: Someone of the people who fear legal risks should remove the apache
>     packages from the archives - distributing a package built from
>     modified sources violates the copyright...

I've been reading /usr/share/doc/copyright, and this might be a good point,
though phrased somewhat trollishly - provision 4 and 5.

 * 4. The names "Apache Server" and "Apache Group" must not be used to
 *    endorse or promote products derived from this software without
 *    prior written permission. For written permission, please contact
 *    apache@apache.org.
 * 5. Products derived from this software may not be called "Apache"
 *    nor may "Apache" appear in their names without prior written
 *    permission of the Apache Group.

Since the package is called "apache", debian is using the apache name to
"endorse or promote products derived from this software" and since the
package is modified (several .info files, a few other miscellaneous things)
that may count as a "derivative".

The fact that the "copyright" file also includes

   This product includes software developed by the Apache Group for use
   in the Apache HTTP server project (http://www.apache.org/).  This
   product includes software developed by Ralf S. Engelschall
   <rse@engelschall.com> for use in the mod_ssl project

also appears to support that this apache package is "derived".

I've read the full copyright file and grepped for terms in
/usr/share/doc/apache.  Am I completely off base?

Rob Bos, rbos@{sandwich.net,linux.com}, expert on everything and everyone

The more freedom they want to take away, the more complicated the language
will be.

Reply to: