[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apache non-free?

On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 02:00:36PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > >  * 5. Products derived from this software may not be called "Apache"
> > >  *    nor may "Apache" appear in their names without prior written
> > >  *    permission of the Apache Group.
> > 
> > That's no different than "Debian". You cannot endorse a product using a
> > trademark without permission. That doesn't make the software non-free.
> But we do make a derivative of Apache and call it apache.  I don't know if
> capitalization makes any difference here, but if it doesn't then it seems to
> me that we are in violation of Apache's license.

This thread was covered on Deban-legal about 8 months ago. Eg, see

'Nuf said.


 James Bromberger <james_AT_rcpt.to> www.james.rcpt.to
 Australian Debian Conference: http://www.linux.org.au/conf/debiancon.html
 Remainder moved to http://www.james.rcpt.to/james/sig.html

Attachment: pgpmvvC7hCc86.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: