Re: autobuilder and non-free
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 12:22:09PM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> Search the (recent) archives of this list for a long discussion.
Sorry, I just learned about that discussion that I somehow missed. Frankly I
have no idea why I missed that.
> Basically because non-free packages often can't be built, and it may
> even (in some cases) be illegal to auto-build them.
> Therefore they are hand-built on all archs they support.
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!