Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to bestarted?]
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to bestarted?]
- From: Peter Makholm <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 00:09:59 +0100
- Message-id: <email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <20011203235610.A19740@Blackbird> (Michael Banck's message of "Mon, 3 Dec 2001 23:56:10 +0100")
- References: <20011203204208.B1177@edelstoff> <Pine.LNX.3.96.1011203162022.11124N-100000@dwarf> <20011203225142.C16499@Blackbird> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20011203235610.A19740@Blackbird>
Michael Banck <email@example.com> writes:
> If you can convince me that there are a lot of DD's working on it and if
> the majority is behind it, it's fine by me but apparently there is some
> dissent on this topic...
How many developers is working on each of the ports? How many is 'a
lot of DD's'?
The correct democratic process should be 'rough consensus and working
code'. When there is some working code we determine what the rough
consensus is either by no-one chalenges the decision made by the
ftp-masters if they are asked for a place to upload stuff or by a GR.
Når folk spørger mig, om jeg er nørd, bliver jeg altid ilde til mode
og svarer lidt undskyldende: "Nej, jeg bruger RedHat".
-- Allan Olesen på dk.edb.system.unix