Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
On Mon, 03 Dec 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> BTW, the FSF will never endorse or recommend a system that contains
> non-free components (like, as you say, most distributions of GNU/Linux).
> Including Debian (as the FSF definition is more strict than the DFSG).
Hmm... Debian does NOT include non-free components. That's why the non-free
distribution (note the missing "Debian" in its name) is in risk of being
dropped.
BTW, contrib is not Debian either. Debian is composed of main and
non-us/main.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?
- From: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>
- Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: Ean Schuessler <ean@brainfood.com>
- Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: Shaya Potter <spotter@cs.columbia.edu>
- Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: Shaya Potter <spotter@cs.columbia.edu>
- Re: Debian trademark [was: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?]
- From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>