Re: virtual package (x-)editor ?
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 07:31:26PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> That says "Use $VISUAL. If it's not defined, use $EDITOR. If it's not
> defined, use editor." Editor is an alternative. What more do you want?
I think he wants that *anything* that may possibly be automatically set
to be the "sensible-editor" actually be a sensible editor (that understands
"sensible-editor -- file", which apparently pico doesn't).
Nick Phillips -- email@example.com
Everything will be just tickety-boo today.