Re: more questions about LFS
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:41:08PM +0100, Emil Pedersen wrote:
> Running "apt-get dist-upgrade"? Would that realy change/benefit much if
> there's only one application (the database engine) that needs lsf
> support? Since it's a server that preferably should be up 24/7 I want
> to stick to the most stable solution possible.
You've already changed the C library...woody is much better tested than
some random combination of woody+potato.
Beyond that, are you sure you won't need *any* other userspace utilities
that recognize large files? Perhaps ls? Once you start doing this it's
often better to stick with an integrated whole than going the piecemeal