Re: STL, memory allocation, and cleanup (gcc 3.0?)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: STL, memory allocation, and cleanup (gcc 3.0?)
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 20:41:41 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20011119204141.E7848@wiggy.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20011119112134.B26234@buici.com>
References: <[🔎] 20011118182755.A12737@buici.com> <[🔎] 20011119104916.W13306@wiggy.net> <[🔎] 20011119112134.B26234@buici.com>

Previously elf@florence.buici.com wrote:
> In the 2.95.4 headers, the cstdio is a simple wrapper.  What is the
> motive for using it?

It puts things properly in the std namespace.

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /wichert@wiggy.net         This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org            http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: STL, memory allocation, and cleanup (gcc 3.0?)
  - From: elf@florence.buici.com

References:
- STL, memory allocation, and cleanup (gcc 3.0?)
  - From: elf@florence.buici.com
- Re: STL, memory allocation, and cleanup (gcc 3.0?)
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
- Re: STL, memory allocation, and cleanup (gcc 3.0?)
  - From: elf@florence.buici.com

Prev by Date: Re: STL, memory allocation, and cleanup (gcc 3.0?)
Next by Date: Re: Freeze Update [2001/11/19]
Previous by thread: Re: STL, memory allocation, and cleanup (gcc 3.0?)
Next by thread: Re: STL, memory allocation, and cleanup (gcc 3.0?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread