[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The Second Great Spelling Check (Re: Package descriptions and making them better)

Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org> writes:

> It violates parallelism, but since upstream uses "perversity" it
> probably should get a free pass.

It doesn't really violate parallelism either, which requires parallel
construction, not parallel morphology.

Reply to: