Re: editor alternatives
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 11:27:35AM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> Wondering, as I prefer to have something simple like nano as my editor,
> also since nano is on boot-floppies, etc., I don't like having vi as
> default editor, it also confuses nearly everyone I know <g> (And causes
> me more time helping them out when they don't quit vi right, or simply
> are completely lost when they end up with it.)
> So I update-alternatives --config editor, and set nano to my default
> editor. I just wonder if we don't want nano to have a higher priority
> than nvi? How do we decide about this kind of thing?
Is someone paying people to cause unrest on the Debian lists by bringing up
this topic every 2 weeks?
/me casts an evil eye toward RHS..
Adam McKenna <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>